comment listing type:
Top New Shortfilms Videos by Vote
Subscribe
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
VideoSift Links
comment listing type: Top New Shortfilms Videos by Vote Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week VideoSift Links |


Quantum knowledge
Brooks was here (the Shawshank Redemption)
Dita Von Teese New Orleans Burlesque StripTease Performance
The architect's speech from the end of Matrix Reloaded movie
He should've pulled a "joker" and switched the doors...
Rob Dougan - Furious Angels
This Trinity's Goin to War
World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King Closed Beta Key (Blog Entry by uhohzombies)
Stairway to Heaven on Harp - full version
>> ^rottenseed:
Watch out...you wouldn't want to "objectify" her.
Age of Conan -- Zero Punctuation Review
These are declining in quality, I think. The standardization of the intro/outro was the first sign of that. It's still better than most other reviews, though.
Diablo theme (Tristram) for two classic guitars
Dark Knight: Load of Tripe (Cinema Talk Post)
People can't fly, Superman's full of crap, but suspending that disbelief and accepting that "people from krypton can fly down here for no good reason" makes that movie world fit together.
Wife Will Never Touch a Gun Again
Start Spreadin' the *NEWS (News Talk Post)
Start Spreadin' the *NEWS (News Talk Post)
To Believe, or Not To Believe, that is the Question... (Religion Talk Post)
The "proof" we have that there IS a consciousness is based on our personal introspective; I know I have a consciousness, because I'm thinking right now; this explanation, however, is unverifiable, as far as I know, and is not really enough to make a claim one way or the other. If I were a philosophical zombie - a being that does exactly what a "real" person would do, but with no "inner life" - I would still act as if I HAD an inner life and thoughts and so on.
It may very well be that there actually is no consciousness as a thing in itself, but only an emergent behavior caused by our brain's different parts, and that we are all philosophical zombies without knowing it.
The point I'm trying to make, is that subjective evidence is not good evidence. Your mind can be tricked very easily, which is why the scientific method involves multiple tests and controlled environments. Uri Geller may SEEM like he can bend spoons with his mind, so the subjective evidence is that he can; in a controlled environment, however, he is a fraud as all "magicians" who claim they aren't making illusions.